DAVID AMES CURTIS: FOREWORD FOR THE CASTORIADIS READER
 
DAVID AMES CURTIS
27, rue Froidevaux 75014 Paris FRANCE TEL/FAX: 
  33 (0) 1 45 38 53 96
  666 Main Street #305 Winchester, MA 01890 USA; TEL: 1-781-729-0523
  CURTIS@MSH-PARIS.FR 
TRANSLATOR'S FOREWORDS

  
  Cornelius 
  Castoriadis, Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy. Ed. David Ames Curtis. Oxford University Press, 1991.
PREVIOUSLY EXCISED TEXT RESTORED FOR
  PHILOSOPHY, POLITICS, AUTONOMY 'S 1989 FOREWORD
 
RESTORED TEXT No. 1; FIRST LINE OF TRANSLATOR'S FOREWORD:
  It is with profound satisfaction, excitement and anticipation that we present 
  here a collection of the most recent and significant writings of Cornelius Castoriadis 
  on philosophy, politics and autonomy.
  
  RESTORED TEXT No.2; END OF SECOND PARAGRAPH:
  One searches with the greatest of difficulty to find any contemporary of comparable 
  stature.
  
  RESTORED TEXT No. 3; EXPLANATION OF ORIGINAL SUBTITLE 
  CHOICE:
  We therefore unabashedly subtitle this volume "essays in the self-transformation 
  of humanity." For, they
  
  RESTORED TEXT No. 4; TWO MISSING PARAGRAPHS ON THE BOOK'S 
  POLITICAL-CULTURAL IMPORT:
  This reaction is somewhat understandable when we consider recent neoconservative 
  attempts to revive a "core curriculum" based upon "Western values." These attempts 
  are themselves an authoritarian, hierarchal reaction against the project of 
  autonomy, as it was expressed by students during the Sixties in their radical 
  questioning of educational "relevance" as well as in their efforts to establish 
  at that time, in the face of corporate hierarchy, a self-managed educational 
  system. Certain "educators" now want to impose from above a canon of texts and 
  ideas (and a test of "cultural literacy"), believing that this will teach the 
  young the (lost) "values" of "the West," usually conceived as "Judeo-Christian" 
  in origin and nature. This ploy harks back (though with infinitely less sophistication 
  and ambition) to the original Great Books program; one of its instigators, Robert 
  Maynard Hutchins, President of the University of Chicago in the 1930s, declared:
   This is more than a set of great books . . . . Great Books of the Western 
    World is an act of piety. Here are the sources of our Being. . . . Here is 
    the faith of the West, for here before everybody willing to look at it is 
    that dialogue by way of which Western man has believed that he can approach 
    the truth. (Quoted in George Steiner, "An Examined Life" [review of Harry 
    S. Ashmore's Unseasonable Truths], in The New Yorker, October 
    23, 1989, p. 143.) 
How one can encourage unfettered dialogue and questioning (an expression of 
  our autonomy) through the imposition from above of a canon and by means 
  of a cultivation of "piety" and "faith" within a hierarchal institutional setting 
  (amidst Gothic buildings) is never explained. All that is lacking for today's 
  neoconservatives is an education Pope, a position to which U.S. Education Secretary 
  William Bennett apparently aspired until he graduated to the more prestigious 
  authoritarian post of "Drug Czar."
 In other words, for those committed to the project of autonomy the neoconservative 
  position is beneath criticism--though we must recognize its true insight that 
  a society must impart its cultural legacy to its coming generations. We should 
  take issue, however, with the response on the part of many of today's students 
  and point out that the critique of education, begun in the Sixties, had lost 
  its way by the end of the Eighties. It is here in the realm of education that 
  Castoriadis's reflection about autonomy and the simultaneous birth of philosophy 
  and politics in ancient Greece (and rebirth in Western Europe) acquire their 
  highest interest and relevance and offer their greatest challenge to contemporary 
  thought.
  
  RESTORED TEXT No. 5; CONTINUATION OF NOTE 3:
  But to designate a cultural formation does not yet tell us anything about what 
  its significations are or how they are. Except in a trivial sene, the social 
  imaginary significations of a cultural formation, the "magma" of such significations, 
  have no biological (let alone racial) basis, nor can they be created by an individual 
  psyche. An illustration of this point can be found in my Foreword to Castoriadis' 
  Political and Social Writings (see note 1 above), where I mention the 
  role of improvisation in the formation of jazz, a "mulatto" art form (and, by 
  implication, of a "mulatto" American culture, which remains, for the most part, 
  unacknowledged). "Whiteness" and "Blackness" are social imaginary signfications, 
  figures that cannot be unambiguously and univocaly assigned or imputed to specific, 
  designatable, separable individuals in any sort of exhaustive way (even though 
  this is how the terms are most often employed). Such a conclusion is, of course, 
  anathema to racist opponents of "miscegenation" or social "race mixing," just 
  as a similar conclusion concerning "maleness" and "femaleness" would be to a 
  confirmed and self-satisfied misogynist (or misanthropist). In Chapters 3, 4 
  and 5 of the present volume, Castoriadis explores the inadequacies of common 
  conceptions of "social theory" in coming to terms with the unique domain of 
  the social-historical.